tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-90101164238939226132024-02-20T11:17:09.333-08:00Mera Bharat Mahan (India-related matters)Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.comBlogger185125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-46136424783476134262015-11-25T20:18:00.000-08:002015-11-25T20:18:04.155-08:00Will Constitution Day become something to celebrate or to rue?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Today is Constitution Day, so I post here the article which will be published in my Guptara Garmagaram column in the next issue of The International Indian magazine (Dubai):
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The Government of India has recently announced that November 26 would from now on be marked as “Constitution Day”.
The question is of course: how come this government, which has done less than any other government in our history to uphold the Constitution, has seen fit to make this move?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Is the move entirely cynical – to provide opportunities to raise questions about the Constitution, and thus subvert it?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Or does it show Modiji, perhaps as a result of the defeat in Bihar, finally moving in the direction of the Constitution?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Time will tell.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Meanwhile, it is worth considering that the Indian Constitution is a counter-cultural document – it was created by our Western-educated elites who were seeking to meld together into one nation what had been diverse and even opposed groups of people.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Not only were there hundreds of independent kingdoms to persuade, bribe, cajole and even blundgeon into joining the new nation of India, there was the enormous challenge of reforming our culture.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Throughout history, Indians had owed primary loyalty to their own family, kinship-group, or caste. How to move them into identifying primarily with the alien notion of a nation?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In our third generation of being an independent nation, it is clear that the project of creating a nation has made huge progress.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Bollywood has played its role, and educational and administrative institutions have played their role. More important, ordinary citizens have played their role, in treating fairly (e.g. in relation to jobs and even marriages) those belonging to other people groups.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But, as all of us know, not all Bollywood films have supported Constitutional norms. Not all educational and administrative institutions have been scrupulous about maintaining fairness and equality. Not everyone has upheld liberty, equality and fraternity.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Some individuals and groups have surreptitiously or openly subverted our Constitutional values. Indeed, some have fought with violence and openly false propaganda against the consequences of the Constitution’s drive to weaken and abolish the prevalence of caste and gender disadvantage, and the restriction of behaviour, thought and other liberties which were so firmly established in our traditions.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In view of all that, it is also worth remembering that the Indian elite which was most involved in the debates in our Constitutional Assembly had considerable differences of opinion. That is clearly evidenced by the records of these debates from December 1946 to January 1950 – fortunately the records can all be easily consulted at http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/debates/debates.htm.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But, if you don’t want to wrestle with all those debates, just consider that the “father of the Constituion”, Dr B. R. Ambedkar resigned from the cabinet in 1951, when parliament stalled his draft of the Hindu Code Bill, which sought to enshrine gender equality in our laws of inheritance and marriage.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
He was merely taking forward the principles and values of the Constitution, but was opposed by the same sorts of conservative forces as had violently opposed, a century earlier, the introduction of English as a language of instruction.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
No wonder the Constitution has been described as 'first and foremost a social document. ... The majority of India's constitutional provisions either directly … further the aim of social revolution or attempt to foster this revolution by establishing conditions necessary for its achievement” (Granville Austin, historian and authority on the Indian Constitution).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
How was this so? Because Ambedkar’s text provided, in the Constitution, guarantees and protections for citizens’ liberties, including the abolition of untouchability, freedom of religion, and the outlawing of all forms of discrimination. The system of reservations for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and Other Backward Classes was directly embedded in the Constitution by Ambedkar as a way of eradicating or at lessening the socio-economic inequalities and lack of opportunities for India's oppressed peoples.<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The strife, tension and chaos we see in Indian politics today is the result of a clash between three things:
first, the civilising momentum of the Constitution;
second, the reaction of traditionally privileged groups upset at losing their privileges, and so fighting with tooth and claw to try to maintain their privileges for as long as possible; and,
third, the assertiveness of those who had been conquered, subdued and suppressed, and who find in the Constitution a promise that is rarely fully delivered but which they now have the liberty and the means to try to insist is in fact delivered.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The government’s move to create a Constitution Day will play a momentous part in either ensuring that the Constitution does deliver liberty, equality, fraternity and well being to all Indians, or in finally killing off our historically unprecedented experiment of creating a nation.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So far, our Constitution has served us well.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Even though there have no doubt been abuses here and there, we would do well to support it, not merely somehow marginally acknowledging it’s existence, but also supporting it fully by our words and our deeds.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-20166741378267107172015-11-13T02:24:00.000-08:002015-11-13T02:24:33.773-08:00Impementation: work versus magic<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
An article in a particular publication says that our Prime Minister is talking a lot all over the world but not doing enough about implementation at home.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is my response:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Arre Bhai, why are you talking about unimportant things like implementation?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Don’t you realize the power of sound?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We only had to change the name of Bombay to Mumbai, and it instantly became a world-class city.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Didn’t you notice the huge improvement in quality of life when we changed Madras to Chennai? Bangalore to Bengaluru? Calcutta to Kolkata?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
No? You did not?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Then it is hardly surprising that you lack belief in Modimagic.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Stand in the dunce’s corner and repeat to yourself 5000 times “I will believe in Magic-ji, I will believe in Mantras-ji, I will believe in Modi-ji.”
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-82010617279928224562015-11-08T22:13:00.001-08:002015-11-08T22:13:52.328-08:00On Prime Minister Modi's embarrassment in Bihar and the future of tolerance in India<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is the latest of my Dadu columns, which is to be published in the next issue of FORWARD Press Magazine (New Delhi):
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dear Dadu
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
After the rising tide of intolerance following the election of Modiji, does the triumph of the Grand Alliance in Bihar represent a victory for tolerance?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Is our tradition in fact tolerant or intolerant?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Love
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Shanti
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dear Shanti
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We have indeed seen an incredible rise in intolerance in India following Modiji’s elevation to the Prime Ministership. However, why it was that he and the BJP lost so spectacularly in Bihar is not entirely clear. It may have been partly a vote for tolerance, but it was also certainly at least to a certain extent the lack of a credible local Bihari leader of the BJP, and it was no doubt also partly coalition arithmetic.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The upshot is that the BJP needs reject its dependence on RSS, so that it has some hope of becoming a mature party which represents the entire nation rather than a party focused only on the interests of a particular set of people. Though the RSS and BJP claim to be “majoritarian”, in fact they do not represent the interests even of all Hindus. RSS/BJP represent the interests only of those upper castes who think that India should become Hindutvan.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Hindutva is merely the latest (from the early 20th century AD) expression of an intolerant strand of Indian tradition which goes back at least to the 6th century BC – you may recollect that Mahavira and the Buddha were both anti-casteist, and were both violently opposed for that reason. The Buddha’s death may have been due to poisoning, and certainly the way his cremation site was treated showed extreme intolerance of his views for centuries.
In India, intolerance has historically had little to do with religion. It has mostly been about caste. But of course caste and religion are inextricably connected. Over the last century, we have tried to disentangle the two – with only very little success.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
By contrast to our intolerant side, we have also had an extremely tolerant side to our traditions, not only because of the continuing influence of Mahavira, the Buddha, and other thinkers and leaders within India but, since the sixteenth century because of the influence of the colonial powers.
In the case of most of the colonialists, the tolerance was for the same reason as most Indian tolerance today: we are prepared to tolerate anything, provided we can retain our privileges, and continue to make money!
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, in the case of some of the colonialists (and some of us Indians today), we are committed to tolerance for its own sake. Modern Indians may not know that the tradition of tolerance among the colonialists arose from the Bible, where God reveals Himself as tolerating our rebellion and even sin – but He tolerates these for the purpose of our realising our stupidity and returning to a relationship with Him. That is what gave rise to the tradition of tolerance in the West – though that is now being infected by “tolerance for the sake of keeping my privileges and making as much money as I can”. In the Bible, too, God asks us to be tolerant of many things as well as intolerant of many things.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So there are further questions raised by your question: Why should we be tolerant? Tolerant of what? Are there things of which we should be intolerant? When should we be tolerant and when intolerant?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In this letter, I will take only the first of these questions: Why should we be tolerant?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
There are of course many reasons, but here are some key ones.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
First, because we do not know everything. Indeed, we know so little that even our wisdom might prove to be mere foolishness or even darkness (as Jesus the Lord pointed out in the biography written by Luke, chapter 11, verse 35).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Second, because others may know more than us, or at least they may know some key things that we don’t know. It takes only a little bit of ignorance about the facts to reach completely the wrong conclusions.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Third, because intolerance shuts people down – they don’t start thinking like you do, they simply continue thinking the way they were thinking, but now they don’t speak up. Resentment and demotivation don’t make for outstanding performance. So intolerance leads directly to an underperforming society and economy.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Let me put my answer to that question in the following way: intolerance is the use of power to impose my own view on someone else. It arises therefore from stupidity as well as from the misuse of power.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The right use of power is to encourage people to flourish. No two flowers are alike. No two humans are alike. Diversity is a divine gift.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Finally, let me conclude this letter with the following questions to you: How much intolerance do you see in our society around you? In our families? In our educational institutions? In fact, how much intolerance do you see in yourself?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In myself, I see a perennial temptation to misusing power and to imposing my own views. God wants me, rather, to be humble, to be a learner, to offer whatever wisdom I might have in the spirit of sharing food, as one beggar might share it with another.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Love
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dadu
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-53916596462915193202015-03-09T00:13:00.000-07:002015-03-09T00:13:36.835-07:00The Death of Modinomics<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
N.B.: This is my latest "Guptara Garmagaram" column, which is due to be published in next issue of THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN magazine (Dubai).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
With the election of Prime Minister Modi, it was clear that most Indians thought that his “Modinomics” would transform India.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But what is (or was) Modinomics? Basically, having an apparently incorrupt political leader who could make the bureaucracy efficient, encourage development of infrastructure to support industry, and work successfully with investors (foreign and domestic) to implement business projects within deadlines.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So is Modinomics in fact dead? If you look at this government’s achievements, you might be tempted to think that it is alive. Consider that ordinary Indians’ welfare payments are now going to be paid directly into their own bank accounts in order to reduce corruption, Foreign Direct Investment is currently running at Rs 1000 crores a day (inflows have crossed $11 billion), the Spectrum auctions have bids worth Rs 86,000 crores (around $13 billion), there has been 10% greater devolution of financial resources to India’s States, and so on.
On the other hand, the government’s main economic roadmap for the next year, the 2015 Budget, is best described as “half-hearted”: the promised “big bang” has failed to materialise.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
This simply continues what has now become the hallmark of this government: its promises continue to be broken, just as its lies continue to be exposed. The government has now confessed it cannot fulfil its promise to cut the nation’s fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP by 2016-17, just as it has admitted as a deliberate lie its promise to bring back all black money it claimed was deposited abroad and so to pay Rs 15 lakhs into the bank account of every single Indian within 100 days of election.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The new way of calculating economic growth which has been inaugurated has left even the nation’s chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian "puzzled ", while RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan did not "want to say anything about the numbers until we understand them better". That was over a month ago and, as the Governor has not said anything till now, it can only be surmised that he does not understand them any better after a whole month of study.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Now, even Modiji’s corporate sponsors have begun to doubt him: on the day I write this, a survey published by ASSOCHAM, the Associated Chambers of Commerce of India, which claims to be India’s oldest, leading, and largest Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said a large majority of CEOs and CFOs find the revised GDP data of over 7 per cent growth "too good to be realistic".
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
What killed Modinomics?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Was it the Kejriwal backlash? No Modinomics had already become merely empty noise by then – and that was at least one important reason for the backlash. Moreover, Modi’s own personal commitment, as well as his involving all the big BJP guns in the election campaign in Delhi, backfired because people got the impression that BJP was more interesting in gaining power at any price than in delivering actual performance – the big guns should have been blazing away at real national problems, not attacking Kejriwal. By contrast, people remembered that AAP had actually delivered on its promises during the almost unbelievably short 49 days that it was allowed to have power in Delhi.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Was Modinomics killed by the RSS’s idiotic campaigns such as Ghar Wapsi, and attacks on mosques and churches? Did that reveal the hard face of the RSS after hopes that the national mandate would cause them to become more responsible? Were Hindus finally coming out with our vaunted religious neutrality? All these may well have played their part.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Or was the reality that Modinomics is a mere mirage in which people were foolish to have put their trust in the first place?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Under Modi, consider Gujarat’s actual record :
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- in the 1990s, its economy grew 4.8%, compared to the national average of 3.7%; in the 2000s it grew 6.9% compared to the national average of 5.6%. That meant that the “Modi effect” increased the difference between Gujarat's growth rate and the national average increased by only 0.2 percentage points (from 1.1 percentage points to 1.3 percentage points). Sure, good, but hardly worth a song and dance. Especially when one compares Gujarat to Maharashtra, which improved its growth rate from 4.5% in the 1990s to 6.7% in the 2000s, so the difference between its growth rate and the national average increased by 0.3 percentage points (from 0.8 percentage points to 1.1 percentage points). Or compare Gujarat with Bihar: the difference between the latter's growth rate and the national average increased by a whopping FOUR complete percentage points (from 2.7 percentage points BELOW the national average in the 1990s, to 1.3 percentage points ABOVE the national average in the 2000s).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- Meanwhile, Gujarat's performance on the Human Development Index actually declined: it had been above the national average in the 1980s & 90s, but decelerated in the 2000s and came down to the national average.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- The level of inequality in Gujarat was less than the national average in the 1980s and 90s, but actually rose above the national average in the 2000s
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- The largest poverty reduction of the past decade was achieved by Tamilnadu, not Gujarat.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So, if the last national election had been based on facts rather than hype, the winner should have been the Chief Minister of Bihar or the Chief Minister of Tamilnadu.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I conclude that the sad fact is that our people believe what they want to believe.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As sentiment moves against the Modi government, the danger is that its real contributions to India’s development will be ignored, just as the real contributions of the last government were ignored.
That is the problem with our being a nation committed to myth and sentiment rather than truth and facts.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
ENDSAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-32060102271632782552014-05-19T21:08:00.000-07:002014-05-21T11:32:39.576-07:00Can the Tiger Ride the Elephant? (or, The Future of India under Modi)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
It can only be good for our country that there is someone with a clear mandate - rather than a hung Parliament, as was widely feared. Modi is a seasoned administrator and a wily politician, with a clear vision of what he wants to do. Even if he hasn't spelt his policies out, his inclinations are fairly clear from his actions in Gujarat and, though his hands will be tied due to the terrible state of India's national finances, his credit is huge at the moment, and he will no doubt make full use of that.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, an overwhelming mandate, such as Modi has, brings with it not only striking advantages but also rather strong disadvantages.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The advantage is that he can do basically whatever he wants. Of the 245 seats in the Rajya Sabha (upper house of parliament), the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance has only 62 seats. However, of the 543 seats in the Lok Sabha (lower house of parliament), as a result of the recent elections, BJP alone has a staggering 336 seats. That gives BJP a total strength of 398 out of 788 – giving it a clear majority in any joint session of the LS and RS. Such a joint session can override states’ rights, so it will be interesting to see in what areas and to what purposes Modi uses this power.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The disadvantage is that, if he does not succeed in any objective that is set for him or that he sets for himself, he will find it difficult to point to a scapegoat and will have to shoulder the entire blame himself.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My guess is that after the honeymoon period is over (six weeks after he is sworn in or earlier, because that is the deadline for him to present his first budget), India will clearly make some or considerable progress economically and militarily. By “some” I mean that we can hardly do worse under BJP than under the UPA in the last phase of its rule, and people won’t remember the earlier good that UPA did. By “considerable”, I mean something matching the massive expectations that our people now have. I hear giddy forecasts of 12% and even 15% growth. The reality is that Modi inherits responsibility for an economy that is facing stagflation, a rather poor fiscal situation with a massive deficit, and a current account deficit that has been artificially subdued but will promptly raise its head at the least provocation – so the most realistic expectation could be something around 7% instead of the current 4% (which would be a huge improvement, of course).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The sort of numerical strength in Parliament, to which I drew attention above, also brings Constitutional changes much more easily within Modi’s reach.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So, with all this power at his disposal, what will Modi actually do?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. Will he continue the regime of subsidies, quotas and guarantees or will he move to radical economic reform? Attracting the kind of foreign money he has drawn to Gujarat may not be particularly difficult, as he should be able to reduce or eliminate policy uncertainty, streamline administration, tackle our infrastructure challenges, boost power supply, rationalise power tariffs, and encourage and create a flexible single market throughout the country. But how will he deal with rising inflation, shrinking manufacturing and India's banking sector stress? Given that we have created less than 8 million jobs per year over the last seven years, what programs will he initiate to generate the 15 million new jobs every year that we need in order for our demographics to become a blessing rather than a curse?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. How will he address India’s glaring income inequality, and ensure progress specifically for dalits/ OBCs/ poor people?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. Will he attack corruption in order to systematically eliminate it - or will he merely centralise it as he did in Gujarat?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
4. Will he now encourage, or will he strangle as he has done in Gujarat, genuine freedom and debate in the Indian press, and among Indians as a whole?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
5. Will he actually set to work on the RSS agenda of integrating Kashmir, eliminating personal rights of Muslims, promoting Hindutvisation and attacking dissenting Hindus – and, if so, what will be the reaction, and how will that be handled by him? Or will he abandon the divisive agenda on which he has ridden to power for an inclusive model as the Constitution requires?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
6. What will be the international response to a much more assertive India? Our historic challenges and interests relate to China, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Will these countries now draw even closer to China, or will a strong India encourage them to reach for some equidistance between China and India? What about South East Asian nations who do want a counter to China? What about Middle Eastern and African nations? Europe and the USA?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Lots of questions. And it is not just India that watches with bated breath for answers, but the whole world.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-89930316190660006442014-04-24T06:25:00.002-07:002014-04-24T06:25:37.979-07:00So who will run India after the National Election results are announced next month?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
People keep asking me ...!
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As if I know...!
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The fact is that, at present, it is impossible to anticipate the upshot: all the prognostications in Indian and foreign media are either wishes or imaginations – we must remember that Indian elections have usually upset all commentators, observers, forecasters, and psephologists.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, as I am as foolish as any other person, I will venture my opinion too!
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here are the 5 possible outcomes, with my probabilities quantified:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
(a) Modi becomes PM with an outright majority: 1%
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
(b) Modi becomes PM though as a result of an alliance with other parties: 5%
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
(c) A BJP-led alliance with someone other than Modi as PM 45%
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
(d) A non-BJP coalition comes to power 48%
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
(e) A party other than BJP wins an outright majority 1%
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Any assignment of probabilities is completely artificial of course.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But this gives you a feeling for my reading of the national mood.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
And you see that the biggest probability is that India will be run by a non-BJP coalition of parties.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-12284962373804716262014-04-05T00:27:00.000-07:002014-04-05T00:27:32.892-07:00Indian National Elections and the Lens of Relationships<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Our world has too much of damaged trust, and broken relationships.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
What has that to do with elections, such as those starting on Monday, 7 April, in India as a whole?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Well, let's work that out, starting with a consideration of relationships and how broken they are in our world.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I am thinking not only of divorces, and children’s suicides because of lack of understanding with parents, but also of recent Indian newspaper headlines such as:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- "Coal India Limited executives go on a 3-day strike" (http://www.thestatesman.net/news/44345-cil-executives-go-on-3-day-strike.html)
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That, surely, is about damaged relationships between a company and its executives.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Or consider this story:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
- "Indian businessman in jail (http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/show-us-the-money-says-supreme-court-refuses-bail-to-subrata-roy
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Does that not reflect broken trust between the businessman and India’s Supreme Court, as well as the businessman and society at large?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Further, I am thinking, within our country, of damaged trust between our politicians and our people.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The current elections are like a beauty parade in which there is no one who is actually beautiful, so you are forced to look for who you consider the least ugly.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
What has caused me to have such mournful meditations? Well, I have recently been asked to chair the Relational Thinking Network or RTN (https://www.facebook.com/RelationalThinking).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Relational Thinking is a lens for analysis, a framework for understanding, and an agenda for action (http://www.relationshipsglobal.net/Web/Content/Default.aspx?Content=32).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As a lens, Relational Thinking (RT) enables us to bypass materialism and individualism. Instead of prioritising income or profit as the goal for personal, corporate or government decisions, RT prioritises relational wellbeing– since ultimately it is our relationships that matter most in life.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Learning to think relationally calls for a Copernican revolution: instead of placing material wealth, or individual rights and freedom, at the centre of our values, with all other things including relationships revolving around them, we place relationships at the centre, to reflect better what we ultimately value.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Consider a simple decision such as buying a microwave oven: you can look at the decision financially (can I afford it?), or spatially (is there room in the kitchen?), or environmentally (how does this affect my carbon footprint?).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Instead, we should look at the decision relationally: would having a microwave enhance or lower relational well-being in our household? What is it that we need to do in order to ensure that the reduced time spent on preparing food permits more time for talking together over the meal, rather than leading to family members eating at different times and not talking together at all?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As a framework for understanding, Relational Thinking challenges the ruling consensus which pursues economic growth whatever the social cost, and leaves the resulting poverty and broken families for ineffective tax and redistribution policies. Instead, putting relationships first asks for the protection of families and communities while pursuing growth, and thus avoiding the need for subsequent redistribution and social intervention.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
For example, a relational system of criminal justice would replace the current emphasis on retribution or mere rehabilitation of offenders with the primacy of reconciling relationships between offenders and the victims of their crimes, because that is what will permit offenders to be restored as responsible members of their community.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
And Relational Schools would not focus on enhancing the ability of each child to maximize individual achievement. Rather, relational schools would focus on nurturing the ability to relate well to others, to take responsibility, to contribute to the well-being of family and community (both local and global), and to what it takes to build a lifelong relationship as the foundation for a new family.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Relational Businesses would reject the idea of maximizing “shareholder value” whatever the cost to the other stakeholders. Rather, a relational company would seek to maximize relational well-being among all stakeholders. Short-term profits often come at the cost of long-term sustainability.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Relational Thinking also provides a framework for analysis of personal as well as organisational relationships. The principles for analyzing relationships were originally outlined in Michael Schluter And David Lee’s book, The R Factor and subsequently developed into the Relational Proximity Model™ by the Relationships Foundation:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
• DIRECTNESS considers whether and how the degree of presence in a relationship is mediated by technology (email, phone, texting etc.), time, and other people.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
• CONTINUITY: the currency of relationships is time! What matters is how much time is spent on a relationship, as well as its overall length and stability.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
• MULTIPLEXITY examines the breadth of knowledge in relationships: work, family, hobbies, community involvement, past experiences.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
• PARITY deals with power in relationships; is the relationship is not that of equals, does the use of power foster participation and respect?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
• COMMONALITY considers the extent to which goals and/or identity are shared; where they diverge, especially through hidden agendas, tension is created in relationships.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
This is all very good. But, in most of the developing world, including India, do we not usually have excellent relationships with our family and friends?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Our challenge in India is rather that we have damaged or broken relationships with society as a whole (e.g. people of other castes, religions, languages....). We also have broken relationships with the natural environment. It could be argued that these are a direct consequence of our broken relationship with God (or Truth or our conscience – call this what you will)... but that takes us into a very wide field.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So let us restrict ourselves to this: at a time when our national elections loom, do we also have a broken relationship with our country?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Most of us seem to be obsessed with: “How can I do well?".
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Some of us evidently even think: "How can I exploit my country for my own benefit?"
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
How many of us really care if such attitudes lead to the weakening and perhaps even the destruction of our country?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
By contrast, Relational Thinking encourages us to ask “What can I do for my country?”
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That is because, at the heart of Relational Thinking is the feeling of generosity, the knowledge that there is enough for everyone’s need but not enough for even one person’s greed.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Elections are merely a mechanism for choosing some individuals as our representatives. But these representatives cannot serve the people if they have no sympathy or generosity.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So, in the elections, should we really vote on the basis of ideology or caste or family or muscle power or wealth or intelligence or corporate experience or so-called "track record"?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Should we not vote rather on the basis of heart qualities?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-23332331048621046602014-03-18T07:06:00.000-07:002014-03-18T07:06:40.047-07:00Alleged foreign funding of Aam Aadmi Party<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
A friend sends me a long mail which allegedly "proves" foreign funding of AAP.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is my response to my friend.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dear XXX
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Thank you for sending this to me.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Regarding it, there are three things to consider:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. Are ANY of our parties free of foreign funding? How much foreign funding comes in to BJP and Congress?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. Which is a greater curse, foreign funding or looting by our own people (that is, by BJP and Congress)...
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. The material you have sent me may have some merit (I will go through it with a fine tooth-comb) but on first reading, it seems to be riddled with suppositions, allegations without proof, and allegations with "proof" (that should be checked) - further, it mixes up money given to individuals with money given to organisations.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
And, just for the record, I don't support AAP because it is "perfect"; I support it because I don't want our country run by a criminal (that is, Narendra Modi - the case against him is set out, for example, in http://sabhlokcity.com/2014/02/modi-lied-through-his-teeth-to-sit-heres-irrefutable-proof). Nor do I wish to have other corrupt individuals in BJP and Congress running our country. I support AAP because it is the only party which is somehow in the tradition of Gandhiji, and supports a relatively simple lifestyle for political leaders, consults and respects the opinions of the people, and is willing to upset the established and corrupt ways of our political system. Also, just for the record, I think that its economic policies are quite wrong - but then I also think (for different reasons) that the economic policies of BJP and Congress are hopelessly wrong.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Politics is about the art of the possible; and AAP is the "least worst" alternative as far as I can see - for THIS National Election. The next time around, I hope there might be a better alternative.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In any case, I always support the underdog, the others have had their chances; AAP should now be given a chance.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
warm regards
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Prabhu
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-39980074435820378752014-03-15T11:00:00.000-07:002014-03-15T11:00:39.365-07:00Which was India's very FIRST "Ram Rajya Party"?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I don't know for sure, but the following might provide a clue (it is in FROM PURDAH TO THE PEOPLE (Editor: Frances Taft), by Padma Shri Laxmi Kumari Chudawat, Rawat Publications, Jaipur and New Delhi, 2000, page 128 - though, except for the translation of the name of the Party, all the material in brackets in the quote is mine):
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"The first election to the (newly-constituted) Rajasthan Assembly was to be held in 1952, and the Rajputs organised (themselves in order) to prevent the Congress, which was committed to jagirdari abolition, from controlling the Assembly. So with great fanfare the Rajputs inaugurated a political party, called Ram Rajya Parishad (Ram's Rule Party) which co-operated with several other parties as well as independents to oppose the Congress. They were led by the Maharaja of Jodhpur Hunuwant Singhji"
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That party did not get anywhere...
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-85475537172012553692014-03-08T08:30:00.000-08:002014-03-08T08:30:23.735-08:00Laxmi Kumari Chundawat, famous Rajasthani writer and former Member of Parliament, but already forgotten in the English-speaking world<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Sheer good luck that, in a 2nd hand bookshop in Portland, Oregon, I came across a copy of Laxmi Kumari Chundawat's autobiography FROM PURDAH TO THE PEOPLE (Edited by Frances Taft), and promptly bought it because it looked so interesting as the memoirs of a Rajasthani writer from the last century (the book was published in 2000 - so not that long ago, but the Kumari was born in 1916, and was still living last year, as far as I can work out).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The curious thing is that a Google search reveals not only NO review of the book, but not even any other reference to the book - and only a couple of stray references to her as a famous Rajasthani writer (which, by the way, give the date of her birth as 1911 - apparently wrongly!).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Apart from being a famous writer, she was for three terms a Member of the Rajasthan State Legislative Assembly, and a Member of India's national Parliament from 1972 to 1978.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In any case, as a member of an Indian royal family, one would have thought that there might be some basic information on her: at least parentage and family, perhaps a list of her books and other achievements - but no such luck.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
By the way, that Google search also led me to the Rajasthan Studies Group (now, apparently, defunct)....
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I am unpopular for holding the view that the Internet is only a very partial source of information, specially on anything to do with the entire period before the rise of the Internet (say about 1995).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
This book is evidence that the Internet is only a very partial source of knowledge even on the period up to the year 2000.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anyway, I've just finished reading FROM PURDAH TO THE PEOPLE, and I find it very well told. Moreover, it reveals a wise and admirable woman.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
FROM PURDAH TO THE PEOPLE should be compulsory reading for all Rajasthanis and for all Indian women - though it is of course far more widely instructive on a vast array of subjects from purdah itself, to Hindu-Muslim relations, sati, the contemporary influence of Jainism and Arya Samaj, and indeed almost all subjects impacted by the transition from pre-Independence to post-Independence Indian life, cultures, society and history.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
An enormous pity that the book was published by a small outfit from Jaipur.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
If any member of her family comes across this post, may I urge them to scan the whole book and put on the Internet.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
If no other site is available, I will happily arrange for my own site to host it.
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-86189783557142573722014-02-20T12:39:00.001-08:002014-02-20T12:39:19.582-08:00Kejriwals response to Mukesh Ambani's issuance of defamation notices to TV channels for broadcasting Kejriwal's statements<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I have just received the following by email as the text of Kejriwal's response to Mukesh Ambani, who has issued notices of defamation to many TV Channels for broadcasting Kejriwal's statements regarding Ambani at a Press Conference; I have no idea whether any of the following text is valid or accurate; however, I provide it below in the public interest - please check the text against other sources (or of course with the principals, if you have access to Kejriwal and AAP); if the text is wrong in any part, I will happily amend or retract it:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Dear Mr Mukesh Ambani,
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You have recently sent a defamation notice to a number of TV channels. Their “crime” is that they aired the press conference held on the 31st October 2012 and 9th November 2012, by Prashant Bhushan and me, live.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"In our press conference, we presented before the country how you had illegally pressurized the government into increasing gas prices. We also told the country that your associates and your companies have accounts
in Swiss banks where black moneyhad been stashed away. Many TV channels aired our expose live. All these TV channels have now received defamation notices from you.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"I find it quite perplexing. If you felt that you have been defamed by what Prashant Bhushan and I said, then we are the real culprits and, if you had to send a defamation notice, it should have been to us.The TV channels merely broadcastwhat we said. Despite this, instead of sending us the defamation notice, you have sent it to the TV channels.It is evident that your sole purpose of sending this notice was to steamroll the TV channels into subservience.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"The people of India want to ask you some straight questions: Is it not true that the list of those who have accounts in Swiss Banks, as received by the Government of India, includes your name and the names of your relatives, your friends and your companies? Is it not true that a balance of Rs.100 crores is shown against your name in this list? Is it not true that you have paid the tax on this amount after this list was received by the Government?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"If the above is true, as we suspect it is, it proves that you have admitted your guilt. As per the law of the land, you should be tried and if the charge of tax evasion is proved, you should be sent to jail.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"However, this would never happen.Why? Because the Government of
India is intimidated by you. You have been reported as saying that the Congress Party has been bought by you – it is your dukaan, to be precise.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You are right. according to some media reports, Mrs. # Sonia_Gandhi sometimes travels by your personal aircraft. People believe that Mr. Jaipal Reddy’s ministry was also changed because of your influence.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Why only the Congress? Even BJP and many other parties are in your pocket. Earlier, Mr. Advani used to make a lot of noise about Swiss Bank accounts, but since your accounts have been exposed, BJP has suddenly gone quiet. BJP has not mentioned a single word in the Parliament about your accounts.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"It appears that almost all parties are afraid of you. Most leaders are scared of you, too. However, the citizens of this country are not scared of you. All parties could be your dukaan but India is not up for sale. India is ours, it belongs to the people of this country. You can purchase political parties and political leaders with your money but we will not let India be sold.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You say that the TV channels have tainted your reputation by airing our
press conference live. That’s wrong. I would urge you to answer this question honestly – Did # Prashant_Bhushan , myself and the TV Channels defame you or did you defame yourself through your own misdeeds?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"1. In 2002, you gave 1 Crore shares with a market price of Rs. 55 per
share to Mr. #Pramod_Mahajan at just Rs. 1 per share. This was a straight bribe to get “Full Mobility”. When you were caught, you took back the shares. Presently, the matter is In court. Didn’t you defame yourself by doing this?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"2. You have made your multistoreyed residence on # Wakf_land. This land had been set aside for an orphanage. You have stolen the right of poor and orphaned Muslim children. Didn’t you defame yourself by doing this?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"3. A few gas wells belonging to the Country were allotted to you in 2000. You were supposed to extract gas and give it to the government. The gas belongs to us, the people of India. We are the owners of this gas.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You were only a contractor appointed to extract the gas. However, cleverly you became the owner of the gas. You started “selling” the gas to the government. Because the Congress is in your pocket, it always bowed before your bullying.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"The Congress kept increasing the price of gas under your pressure and the nation kept wailing. Because of you, the prices of electricity, fertilizer and cooking gas kept rising. When it crossed all limits, Mr. # JaipalReddy opposed you. He was the Minister for Oil and Gas at that time. You got Mr. Jaipal Reddy transferred. Because of you many things have become increasingly expensive in India and the people are groaning under the load of these high prices. Do these shenanigans suit you? Do such acts not defame you?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"The list of such illegal acts done by you is quite long. The majority of the traders, businessmen and industrialists want to do their work honestly. But the system forces them into wrongdoings. But when a businessman like you brazenly subverts the system for his personal benefit, the entire industry and business world gets a bad name.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You are on one side with immense wealth. On the other side are the people of this country. The people have now awakened. Fire is raging in their heart. History is witness that whenever there has been a clash between money and such rage, the rage has won.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Kindly do not try to intimidate the media of this country. There may be some mediamen who may have done wrong things themselves. Such media-persons may succumb to your pressure. However, the majority of media persons keep the interest of the Country at heart even today. They are not going to capitulate so easily. History witnessed that whenever the judiciary, bureaucracy and legislature crumbled, it is the honest fourth pillar, comprising such media-persons that kept democracy alive.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"You have invested in some media houses directly or indirectly. It is possible that these media houses do your bidding. However, the journalists working for such media houses will not barter their integrity so easily.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"What is your dream? Do you want to become the world’s richest person through dishonesty? Suppose you became the owner of all the wealth in this country. Would that make you happy?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Happiness does not increase by accumulating more and more wealth. Happiness comes with sacrifice. If you stopped doing business dishonestly and contributed your wealth for the development of the nation, this country will remember you with pride forever.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"With regards,
"Arvind Kejriwal".
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-61043863652081559922014-02-02T05:10:00.002-08:002014-02-02T05:10:22.155-08:00Upsetting India: Aam Aadmi Party (article published in the current issue of THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN MAGAZINE, Dubai)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Everyone was shocked by the results of the Delhi elections: Aam Aadmi is a political party which did not even exist a few months ago.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Most Indians have still to recognise the significance of the results: the notable thing is that even though BJP won a plurality of seats, it actually lost votes - in spite of Narendra Modi’s supposedly charismatic and magnetic drawing power, the BJP’s vote share actually declined.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The results were not only a slap on the wrist for Congress, they were also a shock for BJP – after the announcement of the election results, the BJP leadership initially boasted that they would still provide the government for Delhi, but when it actually came to the decision, they did not dare to come up to the platform.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
AAP had already announced that it would not work with anyone’s support, and wisely made clear the minimum agreement necessary before it would work with any party. Its 18 point minimum demand is too extensive to list here, but included items which were bound to be totally unacceptable to both Congress as well as to BJP, such as: The VIP culture to be stopped in Delhi: no MLA, minister or Delhi official to use a red beacon on their cars, nor live in big bungalows or be provided any security greater than is available to the ordinary citizen; locally-relevant decisions to be taken directly by the local citizens in ‘mohalla sabhas’ in every locality and colony; complete statehood status for Delhi: the Central Government’s hold on organisations like the Police and the Delhi Development Authority to be ended; an audit of all electricity companies in the national capital from the time these were privatised: licences to be cancelled for any companies that refuse to participate; all unauthorised colonies to be regularised (thirty percent of Delhi’s population lives in such colonies); clean and affordable ‘pakka houses’ (properly built houses) for those living in slums; regular jobs for all those working on contract; roads, electricity, water and other basic facilities to all street traders; setting up enough courts and appointment of a sufficient number of judges so that all uncleared cases are dealt with within six months; and, all sexual harassment cases to be investigated, prosecuted and judgments delivered within three months.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As one person put it on an internet chat group: “AAP had guts to put conditions and its conditions are exactly the demand of people”.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Another put it this way: “I am a supporter of Congress and if they do not agree on most of the AAP’s points, I think I will have to think about realigning my support”.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I am sure the refusal of BJP to support the AAP agenda will also have led to most BJP supporters to reconsider whether their support for BJP should be discontinued.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In any case, it was clear to me and to any other clear-eyed observer that no such minimum agreement would be forthcoming (it is entirely contrary to the spirit and modus operandi of both Congress and BJP).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So it is also clear that we will have a re-vote for Delhi around the time of the National Elections – and that, unless AAP does something extremely stupid before then, or BJP or Congress do something extraordinarily smart, AAP should then win the Delhi re-vote by a clear if not outright margin.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
What AAP’s triumph signifies is a shock to the entire political culture in India which has slowly declined since Independence, and became totally reliant on money- power, muscle-power and caste-based calculations.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
While caste-based calculations still have some hold in the less-developed parts of the country (that is, of course, the actual reason those areas are less-developed), it is clear that their hold is declining and will soon be a thing of the past. At least if ethics- and law-based parties such as AAP deliver administrative performance that matches their promise.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Given the economic and political structure of our country, that cannot be delivered if any such party forms the government only in a few states. As the entire structure of the country is steeply pyramidal, with economic as well as political power concentrated at the top levels of the Central Government, it is necessary for such ethically- based parties also to have power at the national level.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The challenge before AAP and similar parties elsewhere in the country is that of scaling up their effort - and there are indeed efforts for such parties to come together on the basis of a minimum common agenda in order to form a united national Rule-of-Law Front.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
It is already evident that many if not most eminent thought leaders from the country will be with such a front, once it is formed.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Can India move beyond the upset of the Delhi elections to upsetting the entire direction of corruption and incompetence in which it has gone increasingly in the decades since Independence? If so, it will upset many who are currently benefiting from the incompetence and corruption.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But some upsets are good ones.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
___
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
For the full text of the current issue of THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN MAGAZINE, please see http://theinternationalindian.com/index.php
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-50302584436022433442013-12-17T00:31:00.000-08:002013-12-17T00:31:29.907-08:00What economic policies does India need to provide progress for the enormous mass of its poorest people?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
A friend writes:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"What would you like to see in the manifesto of political parties on economic development in India?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Can you lead a small team to help us articulate that, with a focus on the 75% of Dalits, Tribals, Minorities and BCs who are left out of the development processess and gains?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"On XXX (date) a group of about 100 dalit and tribal leaders are meeting at YYY (place) to discuss the way forward to the elections of 2014. Please support this initiative.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"If you are willing I'll set up the groupon Economis policy to work with you on this".
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My response:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dear ZZZ
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The policies needed are simple:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. Clean, efficient and just administration committed to encouraging development, not control (i.e. administration should stop interference in self-development efforts of the people, e.g. all impediments, such as the Foreign Contributions Registration Act, need to be revoked)
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. Good roads, drinkable water, basic health facilities, provision of an educational system that makes sense
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. A legal system that works (appointment of a sufficient number of *suitable* judges, committed to the values of the Indian Constitution - not people like the High Court judge of a Rajput caste who had to be ordered by a Court to release his 30-year old daughter from captivity because she wants to marry a Brahmin)
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
4. Liberalisation of economic activity (most of the licences, permits and registrations in our country are not only useless, they are counter-productive). A *very* few essential things need to be retained and those can easily be identified and agreed on.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The problem in our country is not "avidya" or lack of knowledge about what needs to be done.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The problem in our country is "paap" or sin (we knowingly do wrong things in order to benefit ourselves even if it results in great hardship for many other people).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We do not need more manifestos, we need clear commitment to undertaking actions. AAP and other such rule-of-law parties are coming together to create a national front. Let us support this new movement.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Congress and BJP are on their way out.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
On that topic, I will send you an article, which is due to be published in the next edition of The International Indian magazine (Dubai).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Warmly
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
PrabhuAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-90752984670352424282013-12-01T13:53:00.000-08:002013-12-01T13:53:00.078-08:00Interesting analysis of the configuration of India's political parties<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Interesting point of view, that I haven't come across earlier:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1) The BJP, as is well known, is a front for the RSS, but it is now dominated by the Other Backward Castes, so the RSS wants the BJP to die as early as possible.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2) AAP is the other front organisation of the RSS. Kejriwal is a strong opponent of reservations for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes & Other Backward Castes.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3) From the RSS point of view, Modi's candidature for the post of Prime Minister is not for the purpose of defeating the Congress-led UPA, but for the purpose of defeating the (possible) Third Front, and that is because the third front is also dominated by the Other Backward Castes.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That is an interesting caste-oriented analysis. I'm afraid I myself don't think much in terms of caste-conglomerations. As one of my friends said in a post today, democracy has gone from being "a government of the people, for the people, by the people" to being "a government of the winning cluster of voting people, for the winning cluster of voting people, by the guys who got their maths right about which was the winning cluster of voting people."
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My own view is that, when everything is up for grabs, it is better, naively, to support anyone who is willing and seems remotely capable of delivering an honest government devoted to the welfare of India's citizens.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In Delhi, at present, that's Aam Aadmi Party for me.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I'm sorry, but all the "science" of the psephologists doesn't impress me too much about India's future right now.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-7028245413028041252013-11-25T13:45:00.003-08:002013-11-25T13:45:28.166-08:00ARVP reports from other parts of the country<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Based on the vision of uniting India's backward and oppressed groups (who form 60% of the population), work is now underway in the following states:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1) Andhra Pradesh
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2) Odisha
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3) Chattisgarh
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>4) Jharkand
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>5) U.P
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In U.P this month, there is going to be a padyatra in at least one constituency where 1000 to 2000 people will be walking from
their village to endorse this vision.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We hope that we will be able to follow this up in the other constituencies in the month of December.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
It has been a hard grind and continues to be a challenge, nevertheless we press on.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We solicit your support in this endeavour.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-83672335581014249702013-11-25T13:42:00.001-08:002013-11-25T13:42:10.000-08:00Meeting in Mumbai of Representatives of 60% of India's population, organized by Adarsh Rashtriya Vikas Party<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The meeting in Mumbai was a continuation of the meeting that took place in Delhi on the 4th and 5th of September .
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Based on the brainstorming that has taken place over several months, came the idea to focus on the core constituency most affected by bad leadership.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Though on a general level, bad leadership affects the most poor and marginalised: Dalits comprising Hindus, Christians, Buddhists and what is termed as the pasmanda or Dalit Muslims. The second group identified was the scheduled tribes excluding for the moment tribes located in the north east. The third category were the backwards.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The realization came that these 3 groups form close to 60% of the population and in-spite of these large numbers find themselves the most underdeveloped, discriminated against, and persecuted.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The vision of ARVP is to envision these groups to come together on a single platform unifying these groups based on their common victimhood. However, this platform needs to be led by people who embody servant leadership and integrity.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The meeting in Mumbai, had two groups represented the Dalits and the Pasmanda Muslims, and was chaired by Shri Mahesh Bhatt,
Maulana Mustakeen Azmi, and Anand Raj Ambedkar. The meeting was called for and organized by ARVP. About 250 people were present. The presentation by ARVP had a huge impact on the people who came and speaker after speaker endorsed the need and the vision of
ARVP. Mahesh Bhatt and Mustakeen Azmi were the most vocal on the issue and kept referring to the need for unity of these groups.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
After the meeting, many leaders came forward to express their desire for another meeting between key leaders representing the two groups.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The meeting also had representatives from the Aam Admi Party who came as a group and requested that Aam Admi Party and ARVP should join hands. This was followed up by a telephone call by Mr. Mayank Gandhi head of the Maharastra Unit of AAP wanting to have a meeting on the 21st November in Delhi.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Many thanks to the efforts and hard work of Navin Tauro and Abraham Mathai, without whom the meeting in Mumbai could not have taken place.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-59501645957900126242013-10-21T17:00:00.000-07:002013-10-21T17:00:29.194-07:00Why neither Narendra Modi nor Rahul Gandhi will be India’s next Prime Minister<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As some of my readers will know, I write a regular column in THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN magazine (published from Dubai). This is titled "Guptara Garmagaram" and has been willing to publish views that none of the major Indian publications has been prepared to countenance.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is the latest of my columns, which will appear in the next issue of THE INTERNATIONAL INDIAN:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Supporters of both Narendra Modi (NaMo) and Rahul Gandhi (RaGa) have started campaigning intensely with a view to seeing their favourite made India’s next Prime Minister (PM). Actress Mallika Sherawat produced a birthday video for NaMo, and my cousin has just sent me singer Krishnan Sugavanam's “youth anthem” which praises NaMo - the lyrics describe his humble beginning as a tea vendor and go on hypnotically to project NaMo’s candidacy.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As for RaGa, many people have predicted that Congress will win inspite of the NaMo factor – whether RaGa then gets a shot at being PM remains to be seen.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The facts are that while BJP will certainly win around 130 seats (it holds 117 seats at present), there is no way that BJP can win more than 200 seats of the 552 in the Lower House of Parliament (Lok Sabha).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The Upper House is also important in terms of legislation, it has 238 representatives of the Indian States and 12 members nominated by India’s President for their contributions to art, literature, science, and social service – though the Upper House is not significant in terms of political control and rather balances the interests of India’s people as a whole by the interests of India’s States.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Congress supporters think that they will definitely win 140 seats and may win many more (they hold 206 seats at present) – and some seem to think that, given developments in the last few weeks and those that can be foreseen before the elections, Congress may even win enough seats to form a government on its own (and certainly with the support of other parties). No wonder a Congress victory has been asserted as certain by Congress functionaries, ranging from RaGa himself to various minions.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
On the strength of present surveys what we can definitely say is that neither BJP nor Congress seems at all likely to have an absolute majority in the Lok Sabha. After the elections, therefore, it will be a matter of which party can gather enough other parties around it to form a majority in Parliament. That party seems extremely unlikely to be BJP, since everyone knows that Modi’s strength as well as his weakness is his dictatorial tendency; with him it is “My way or the highway”.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
As a result of that, the most likely result is that Modi may end up in Parliament at best as Leader of the Opposition.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
RaGa too has many weaknesses so, in my view, a Congress-led alliance willl only be possible at the cost of a compromise candidate – someone other than RaGa.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, there is a wild card in these elections: entirely new political parties have begun to make their presence felt.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Morever, this is the first election where voters will have the option of voting for “None of the above options” in order to reject all the candidates contesting the election in a constituency.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
What good that does in terms of having a result in an election is not clear: what happens if the majority in a constituency votes “None of the above”? Do all the parties then put up fresh candidates for a fresh round of voting? No doubt, we will come to that pass sooner or later – when it will be interesting to watch what happens.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The dates of the elections for seats in the State Parliaments have now been announced for Delhi, Rajasthan, Mizoram, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh – and these will be between mid-November and early December, though the votes in all these will be counted on a single day: December 8. That will provide an early indication of which way the wind is blowing for the national elections, though the Indian voter has been consistently canny in sending candidates from different parties to the State Parliaments as against the National Parliament.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Don’t be surprised if the new Parties sweep the board. For example, in the elections for the Delhi Legislative Assembly, a Party that did not exist only a few months ago, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is expected to take 18 out of the 70 seats, according to a poll by ABP News and Nielsen a few days ago (the last poll, a few weeks ago, gave AAP only 8 seats!).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My view is that, as we get closer to the elections, AAP will actually overtake both BJP and Congress to become the single largest party in Delhi - and may even win outright, specially given that its leader, Arvind Kejriwal, is already the most popular candidate for Chief Minister of Delhi. Thirty two per cent of the respondents preferred Kejriwal as the Chief Minister, while 27 per cent preferred the Congress incumbent Sheila Dikshit, and only 27 per cent were for the BJP’s Vijay Goel. Merely in the few weeks between August and the beginning of October, Kejriwal gained a whopping eight per cent over the BJP and Congress candidates.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
AAP is, at present, contesting seats only for the Delhi Assembly. However, if it does well here, I have no doubt that it will rapidly spread its wings nationwide. A large number of Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) who were totally disinterested in politics in view of the widespread corruption in both BJP and Congress, have become active supporters of AAP, many of them actually moving physically to Delhi to support the AAP campaign.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
This is in addition to the increasing number of NRIs who, as can be seen on the AAP website, are supporting it financially – not to mention first-time Indian supporters of any party.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
But the AAP is only one of the new parties. For example, there is the ARVP (Adarsh Rashtriya Vikas Party) which claims to bring together India’s OBCs, Dalits, Tribals, Muslims and other religious minorities. There is the Professionals’ Party of India (PPI) whose aim is to “improve the quality of life of every Indian”. In anticipation of the national elections, PPI has announced that it “has joined hands with like-minded eminent people, whose primary aim is Nation Building”. Its earlier “Core Group has been reconstituted to provide the party a nationwide support base and a National presence”. However, this is supposed to be “just phase 1” of its plan for more exciting development in the months ahead, during which it is “resolved to provide … the best possible list of candidates who, with your support, will make this nation proud”.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Though, for my taste, we have in our country far more talk of “pride” than is justified by our “work” and by our “achievement”, it is possible that such new, ethically- and nationally-oriented parties will come together to form a New Front in the months ahead, which would be a genuine national alternative to the two old and tired parties.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
AAP has already said that it will support neither BJP nor Congress.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
If this New Front persists in ethically-based behaviour, it has the best chance of taking the country forward – provided it is not merely ethically-based but also capable of actually delivering better infrastructure, better education, and a better quality of life.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
One final fact: we have a new generation of voters that have become eligible to vote – 75 million of them. These young people have no necessary ties with either of the two old parties, and are unlikely to be influenced by their parents.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That is why I, who don’t usually bet, am prepared to bet that neither NaMo nor RaGa who will be the next Prime Minister of India, but an entirely fresh face.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-85680086081344325652013-09-15T00:03:00.002-07:002013-09-15T00:03:30.444-07:00When a Dalit woman is dishonoured and her family's life threatenedA report in question is at http://newindianexpress.com/nation/NHRC-push-for-relief-to-disrobed-dalit/2013/09/15/article1785270.ece
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Basically, the report says that the The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has asked the Sambalpur District Magistrate in Odisha to see whether any temporary relief can be provided under any welfare scheme to Subidha Buda, a BPL Dalit, who was disrobed and forced to stand naked in front of the public in Jayaghanta village on September 6 last year.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In fact, the woman was not only forced to stand naked, her hair was cut, she was insulted and beaten black and blue. Shrimati Buda, along with her son, a class V student and her daughter, both minors, left the village and took shelter at her elder daughter’s house. In the meantime, the house of the victim has been demolished.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My response:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"This is ridiculous!
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Does a District Magistrate or indeed any human being really need a request or order from any Commission to provide "temporary relief" to a woman forced to stand naked and beaten?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"If a District Magistrate lacks even such elementary human sympathy or sense of duty, should this kind of person be allowed to become or continue as a District Magistrate?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"It is worth asking whether such an event could ever happen in a District without the complicity of the local Magistrate? If not, how come he or she did not immediately swing into action against the culprits?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Indeed, how come the Magistrate has not been disciplined by her or his superiors? Does this not indicate the complicity of the superiors in such matters?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Of what use is a Commission if it cannot pose such basic questions?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"What is wrong with us Indians that we react only when middle-class women get raped in Delhi, but do not react when a Dalit's honour and even a whole family's life is compromised in our Districts?"
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-38566264838806649992013-09-08T09:29:00.000-07:002013-09-08T09:29:20.090-07:00Please consider signing Letter of Protest to India's Ministry of Human Resource Development, regarding their Notice to Professor Yogendra Yadav of the University Grants Council<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
I have received the following plea from a trustworthy fellow-academic. I am not aware of all the details of the case, but the details given below have satisfied me sufficiently to prompt me to sign the letter. I would request you to consider doing the same - if you wish to do so, please send an email to Shri Prashant Bhushan on prashantbhush@gmail.com OR to Prof. Anand Kumar at anandkumar1@hotmail.com
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is the text of the letter of protest:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
To
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dr. M. Mangapati Pallam Raju,<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Minister of Human Resource Development,<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Government of India.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Dear Dr. Raju,
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The news of the Ministry of Human Resource Development serving a show-cause
notice to Prof. Yogendra Yadav, Member, UGC, to explain why he should not be removed
from the UGC has shocked and dismayed the academic community. The notice mentions
a conflict of interest, Prof. Yogendra Yadav being an active member of a newly registered
political party, as the reason for such removal.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The UGC has a formal policy on Conflict of Interest and Code of Conduct for
Members of the Commission which does not mention political activity as a potential
conflict of interest. The University Grants Commission (Disqualification, Retirement and
Conditions of Service) Rule, 1992 provides for specific grounds of disqualification
which, again, does not include membership of a political party as a valid ground.
It is evident that the decision of serving the show-cause notice stems from the fact
that Prof. Yogendra Yadav chose to be an active member of the Commission who raised
questions and recorded his objections in regard to several matters of national importance
such as the introduction of the four year undergraduate programme in Delhi University,
bypassing of the recommendations of the UGC committee in the notification of the API
scheme, closing down of Centres for Social Inclusion and Exclusion, and the decision to
set up a Centre on Teacher Education in a Technical University that does not even have a
department of education. Prof. Yogendra Yadav’s persistent efforts to point out
irregularities in the conduct of Commission meetings and recording of minutes also
seems to have put some officials in an uncomfortable situation.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We believe that such active concern is precisely what should be expected from a
member of a body of national importance like the UGC as this is what strengthens the
working of such bodies. We are shocked that the Ministry, which, in a healthy democracy,
should have given due importance to the matters raised, and should have encouraged such
vigilant participation, has instead initiated the process of removing the member. Such a
measure sends a strong message of intolerance towards all members who consider it their
duty to express their opinions and threatens to severely erode the ethos of informed
debate and fearless participation. It demonstrates an utter disregard for the autonomy
vested in the institution of the UGC without which it cannot be expected to play its role
as a regulatory body effectively.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We, the undersigned, therefore urge you to take immediate steps to withdraw the
show-cause notice issued to Prof. Yogendra Yadav.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-82893905867563337112013-08-17T02:13:00.000-07:002013-08-17T02:13:05.207-07:00The History of Lord Ganesh<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Following other interaction with Sharmaji, one of our scholars, I asked: "Ganesh is worshipped as the first god in all yagyas. I have been trying to find out: Since when this is the case? And why? He is not mentioned in the Rg Veda."
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Sharmaji responded:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
"Lord Ganesh is mentioned in Ramayan and Mahabharat. Rg Ved mantras are in praise of nature and deities that personify its different aspects. Later, priests used these deities for sacerdotal puposes and[i] devotees to begin their puja etc. Ganesh is Ganpati, the people's god for beginnings and ceremonies. [ii] My conjecture is that he became popular in epical eras. Ganesh is more for the denizens of Sansar; Indra and definitely Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh, Mata Durga and other goddesses belong to the higher or other Loks, ethereal regions of devatas and rakshasa like bhasmasurs etc. Parvati is often shown to intervene on behalf of ordinary people in folklore and Ganesh is beloved son of Parvati. For him, going round his parents, Parvati-Shiva as the legend says,is the whole universe."
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
This response is fine as far as it goes, but I think you will agree that it does not really answer my question.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So I now open the question to all my readers, and will be grateful for any light that anyone can throw on it.
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-36748251019614554352013-08-15T23:18:00.001-07:002014-03-09T21:57:10.556-07:00The Role of Corporate Governance, Citizen and Employee in Fighting Corruption, Enabling Development<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
When the British East India Company (EIC) became Bengal’s dominant power in 1757, the geographical area which came to be known as India was divided into about a thousand kingdoms.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Whether Hindus or Muslims, whether Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains or whoever, our forefathers knew caste, kingdoms, and empires, but not one person in our vast land had the political vision of uniting warring kingdoms into a nation-state, because the idea of a nation-state was a foreign one (it was invented in 1648, on the basis of the renewed understanding of the Bible which emerged in Europe from the 13th century and resulted in the Protestant Reformation). From 1757, it took the British just about a hundred years to create the colony which went on to become the nation that is now known as India.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
That entire enterprise was driven by economics and politics: the EIC was a private company which got itself entangled with politics, as large-scale private enterprise always does.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, in the 18th and 19th centuries, the British did not see history as a process driven by blind accidents of meaningless history. They saw history as working out God’s vision for humanity: God’s standards of truth, law, justice, and mercy creating more and more collective good. Adam Smith’s invisible hand, in their understanding, was nothing other than the hand of God, who wants us to act with Him to build our social, economic and political structures on truth, righteousness and justice.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
You may miss a lot when you read the Bible, but you can’t miss the fact that the Bible shows God as being intimately involved in the world’s history, for the purpose of punishing sin and redeeming the repentant, to guide human destiny to a renewed earth and heaven, where our ultimate enemy, death, will be vanquished and eternal life will be the norm.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Even though the majority of British colonists did not follow the Bible and were interested only in looting India, Bible-believing British people saw colonization as offering to Abraham’s spiritual descendants a God-given opportunity to play a role in fulfilling God’s purpose to bless India by making it a great nation (see, for example, Genesis 12:2-3 and 18:18).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The mission to make India a great nation required bringing our individual sinfulness as well as our socio-religious evils under the searchlight of God’s truth. That could be done only if the Bible was translated and published, and then applied to specific areas of institutionalized darkness such as idolatry, inequality before law, untouchability, infanticide, widow-burning, child-marriage, polygamy, mass illiteracy, corruption, and feudalism. It is only when our social evils encountered the teaching of the Bible that the nineteenth century social reform movement was triggered which is known as the Indian Renaissance (more correctly, the first Indian NAISSANCE, as there had been none earlier, at least not from a social point of view: Thomas the Apostle, for example, and Guru Nanak and others, had tried, but it had not till then resulted in any India-wide re-start of something old, which is what the word “renaissance” means).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anyway, Bible-inspired efforts set India on course to become a great nation by nurturing and strengthening three essential areas:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. cultivating love for truth and virtue through mass education, development of vernaculars, import and use of the printing press, and journalism;
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. creating a legal environment for development through land reforms, property rights, development of the penal code, of a modern judiciary, and a consistent monetary system throughout the country;
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. building a nation-wide infrastructure for administration, transportation, and communication.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Naturally, the British got many things wrong. But they also got at least a few things right.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, since Independence, the influence of the Bible, most often mediated through Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Marxists and others, continues to inspire new developments that take us in the direction of truth and justice.
At the same time, a rising generation who are committed to materialism, even if often sheltering under the garb of religiosity, has undone some of reduction in institutionalized evil (e.g. by corrupting education, administration, Parliament and law) and created new institutionalized evils – e.g. by scams and corruption of various new sorts.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So we now have in our country a patchwork of institutionalized good and institutionalized evil, and what we would like to discuss is the role of corporate governance in reducing institutionalized evil.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The impact of the Bible has meant that, except for a few diehard feudalists found in the RSS and BJP (and even in those organizations, their influence is less than it once was – though it may rise again if Modi delivers electoral victories) – as I said, except for a few such diehard feudalists, all the public discourse in our country honours concepts of inclusive growth, secularism, equality, liberty, fraternity and democracy.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The problem in our country is that our culture divorces<i></i> sound from meaning, and imposes a gap between what is said and what is done, as well as between appearance and reality.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
How does our culture divorce sound from meaning? Take “Aum” for example. It is a very powerful sound in our culture, and you will find people discussing the healing and other qualities of the vibrations of that sound. But what does Aum mean? Well, it means whatever you want it to mean, from nothing to everything: I have heard at least 50 different explanations of what it means. The fact is that you can come up with your own interpretation, and if people like it, then it becomes an acceptable or even the most acceptable explanation. That is why the role of PR is so important in our country. Our culture does not emphasise what is real, what is true, so all that we are left with in our dominant culture is propaganda - which is why Modi hires so many hundreds of people in Bangalore and other centres to pump out his propaganda in every major newspaper and radio and TV station in India, and now even abroad.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Not only does our culture divorce sound from meaning, our culture also imposes a gap between what is said and what is done. How often have you heard a statement similar to: “<i>Sahib ek minute lagega</i>” (when the speaker has no idea of how long it will take, or even knows that it will take half an hour). Of course, part of the explanation is our Indian concept of “politeness” (which actually means an inability or unwillingness to tell the truth) and part of the explanation, in this particular case, is that our culture has no concept of the importance of time, because the <i>kal </i>that has gone (yesterday) is the same word as the <i>kal </i>that is to come (i.e. tomorrow): the lack of the importance of time is structured into our language, into the way we think. If this life is only one among innumerable births, then why is time in this life important? The time that is given to us in this world is only important if this is the only life we have and if, after this life is completed, we have to give an account to Somebody of how we have spent each minute and each second. But these are ancillary matters, the key point that I would like us to keep in mind is that, whatever the reasons, our culture has a deep and profound gap between what is said and what is done. Of course that is part of a universal human tendency, but one’s culture can either reinforce that tendency (as in our own culture) or it can struggle against it, as in Protestant cultures (e.g. of Northern Europe).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So our culture divorces sound from meaning, and it accepts a large gap between what is said and what is done; how does our culture split appearance and reality? Well, we could discuss at length the notions of <i>izzat </i>and <i>shaan </i>versus the real quality of relationships in the home, or even the real quality of life in the home. If I am willing to murder an unborn child or my grown-up daughter for the sake of <i>izzat</i>, what kind of <i>izzat </i>is that? Is it not an attempt to preserve an appearance, for the sake of which people are willing even to eliminate the reality of the life of our own flesh and blood?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In our culture, we have to struggle against the gap between appearance and reality (Mat 7.15); we have to struggle against the gap between sound and meaning by letting our Yes mean Yes (Mat 5.37); we have to struggle against the large gap between what is said and what is done by being people who, once we have said something, will do it even if it is to our disadvantage (Psalm 15.4).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
If these are some ways in which evil is institutionalized in our country, what are some ways in which good is institutionalized? Well, consider our Constitution. Clearly it institutionalizes counter-cultural values such as democracy, freedom from hunger and education for all. But it is for you to tell me to what degree we actually have liberty, equality and fraternity in our country. Do we have the rule of law or has the law itself been turned, at least in many places and occasions, into becoming itself an instrument of exploitation, for example by the police on the road?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
We may have good laws but, even those good laws, such as panchayati raj, can become a means of oppressing the lower castes (and that is the case even when a lower caste person becomes the Panchayat Sarpanch, she or he is simply manipulated by the upper castes and if the person refuses to comply has been known to have been beaten up, raped or even killed). Of course such malpractices do not mean that the institution of Panchayati Raj is somehow wrong. No. Malpractices mean rather that citizen power is required to identify malpractices, report malpractices, and pursue malpractices through the institutions of redress till wrongdoers are identified, judged and punished. Every case of a wrongdoer being punished is a blow for the right, and a demolition of the culture of injustice in our country. Exactly for that reason, every instance of the honouring (for example by a Prize or Award or Padma Bhushan or whatever of a person who has done something good) should be celebrated because it strengthens the kingdom of Right. Of course a Padma Bhushan or Award or Prize might be given to someone unworthily, and then it is our duty to expose that and to correct it.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, the human tendency is to talk too much of the negative and not enough of the positive. As the Bible puts it: "Whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things". We should focus our minds on such things - because if we don’t do so, it is too easy to become depressed, to become apathetic and withdrawn from the effort to build up our country, our people and ourselves.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Of course, governance is not only about where we should focus our attention, or about values. It is also about creating the right structures. That is why, at the highest levels in our political structure, we have a division of powers between the legislature, the executive, and the courts. And that is why our founders also institutionalized the freedom of the press. Of course, evil always tries to subvert each of these, and it is up to us to use the instruments offered to us by all these to fight against what is wrong, and to fight for what is right. You may have noticed that China has detained Xu Zhiyong, the prominent lawyer known for his support of human rights and greater government transparency, merely on suspicion of “gathering people to disturb public order in a public place”. Though India also has somewhat similar incidents occasionally, they are unconstitutional in India whereas they are entirely in accordance with the law in China. By contrast, if an IPS officer is doing something wrong in India, you have the right to gain access to that officer’s superiors or, if even that person refuses to act rightly for any reason, you have the right to gain access to the courts – you certainly have the right to gain access to the press – as well as the right to have access to the public, to organize a mass protest. Of course, all these may not be enough, and we may be defeated by evil in particular cases, but followers of the Light are called to rise again and fight again, in spite of defeats and reversals, whether in terms of their own personal and family lives or in terms of social and political life. Perhaps you also noticed that Zhang Xiaoming, China’s top representative in the Chinese colony, Hong Kong, met pro-democracy lawmakers this week for the very first time since the territory was taken over by China in 1977. This would be simply incredible in India, where we have had talks right from the start, perhaps not as often as would have been desirable, with separatists in the south, north-east and north of our country.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
To continue with the theme of the right structures for corporate governance in our country: these include not only those of the Constitution at the highest level, or exalted things such as the separation of powers but, more recently, quite down to earth things such as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and Right to Information (RTI) and Right to Education (RTE) and now the Right to Food (RTFood). Naturally, not everything is fine with these, let alone their implementation, but you and I need to be active and help to implement the system that is envisaged, and then identify how best to improve the operation of the system, whether in its implementation or even in the way it should be organized.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In the commercial sector, we have the proposed governance norms for all publicly traded companies produced by SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), which are actually tougher than corporations face in more advanced economies. For instance, the CEOs in only about half of India's top 50 listed companies still double as chairmen, and they will be required to split their roles (those that want to continue combining the roles will need the explicit approval of their shareholders). Further, SEBI wants to require companies above a certain size to appoint at least one independent director from among small shareholders. Still further, SEBI is apparently going to require independent directors, who resign their position, to publicly disclose the reason(s) for their departure - and "personal reasons" won't be considered a satisfactory answer if directors are only giving up one of multiple directorships. Till recently, Company founders in India have been happy with eager-to-please boards: you may recollect the way "independent" directors of Satyam Computers rubber-stamped the former CEO's desperate attempt to cover up fraud in December 2008.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Of course, changing the rules is no guarantee of future good behaviour. Even boards that boast of independent leadership can do better. Infosys Technologies, the only Indian entry last year in CLSA's selection of 20 large Asian companies with best corporate governance, lists KV Kamath, a former banker, as a non-executive chairman. But a former Infosys CEO holds the position of executive co-chairman. Meanwhile, Kamath continues to be "independent" chairman at ICICI, even though he was its founding CEO.
So there are all kinds of holes and challenges, but the fact is that the web of corporate governance is gradually becoming more and more tight, and that is the case not only in India but also globally.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Let me summarise. Corporate governance, whether at the level of an NGO, a company or the country as a whole, has three dimensions: the dimension of whether the right values are embedded and nurtured, the dimension of whether the overall structure helps or hinders, and the dimension of the individual initiative and willingness to sacrifice one’s own time and energy and money and interest that is required in order to fight corruption and enable development. Due to limitations of time, I have focused on how these dimensions are essential to fighting corruption, but I am sure that you can see how these three dimensions are also necessary to enabling development.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Thank you.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-17697308115720966522013-08-15T20:50:00.001-07:002013-08-15T20:50:30.198-07:00On Generosity in Indian tradition versus other traditions<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Re-reading the Kural this morning, I am struck by how different the emphasis in our own (Indian) traditions is, compared to other traditions, regarding who should be grateful, for what, and in what manner.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In the Koran, for example, the emphasis is on human duty to God - and it is God Himself who seems to be grateful to humans when they do right (which I find strange, but then there are elements that appear strange to me in all systems of belief including those in philosophy, science, psychology, medicine, economics, and so on).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
For the Jews (and therefore for followers of Jesus the Lord, whether Hindus or others) the emphasis is on God's generosity to humans for the gifts of life, abilities and talents, food and shelter and air...so: humans ought to be generous to other humans because of gratitude to God, which should motivate us to want to love God, and motivate us to become like Him. We should be generous because generosity is God-like.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
However, in the Kural, it is the human being who receives from other humans who ought to be grateful, totally and forever ....
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In other words, the Biblical view is that the recipients of God's love and grace (that is, all human beings) ought to be so grateful that they long for God, and long to be like God - and, therefore, in turn, become generous.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In the Kural, the emphasis is on humans who have received anything (however small) from other humans, feeling a sense of indebtedness to those who have been generous - a sense of indebtedness to a donor that should last forever.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The chapter on gratitute in the Thirukkural has the following ten couplets only (presented at http://www.kural.kalyanam.ca/kcha011.html from the book: TIRUKKURAL with translations in English by Rev Dr G U Pope, Rev W H Drew, Rev John Lazarus and Mr F W Ellis Published by The South India Saiva Siddhantha Works Publishing Society, Tinnevelly, Limited. India (1982):
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-101
Assistance given by those who ne'er received our aid,
Is debt by gift of heaven and earth but poorly paid.
(THE GIFT OF) HEAVEN AND EARTH IS NOT AN EQUIVALENT FOR A BENEFIT WHICH IS CONFERRED WHERE NONE HAD BEEN RECEIVED.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-102
A timely benefit, -though thing of little worth,
The gift itself, -in excellence transcends the earth.
A FAVOUR CONFERRED IN THE TIME OF NEED, THOUGH IT BE SMALL (IN ITSELF), IS (IN VALUE) MUCH LARGER THAN THE WORLD.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-103
Kindness shown by those who weigh not what the return may be:
When you ponder right its merit, 'Tis vaster than the sea.
IF WE WEIGH THE EXCELLENCE OF AN BENEFIT WHICH IS CONFERRED WITHOUT WEIGHING ITS RETURN, IT IS LARGER THAN THE SEA.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-104
Each benefit to those of actions' fruit who rightly deem,
Though small as millet-seed, as palm-tree vast will seem.
THOUGH THE BENEFIT CONFERRED BE AS SMALL AS A MILLET SEED, THOSE WHO KNOW ITS ADVANTAGE WILL CONSIDER IT AS LARGE AS THE PALMYRA FRUIT.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-105
The kindly aid's extent is of its worth no measure true;
Its worth is as the worth of him to whom the act you do.
THE BENEFIT ITSELF IS NOT THE MEASURE OF THE BENEFIT; THE WORTH OF THOSE WHO HAVE RECEIVED IT IS ITS MEASURE.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-106
Kindness of men of stainless soul remember evermore!
Forsake thou never friends who were thy stay in sorrow sore!
FORSAKE NOT THE FRIENDSHIP OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN YOUR STAFF IN ADVERSITY. FORGET NOT THE BENEVOLENCE OF THE BLAMELESS.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-107
Through all seven worlds, in seven-fold birth, Remains in mem'ry of the wise.
Friendship of those who wiped on earth, The tears of sorrow from their eyes.
(THE WISE) WILL REMEMBER THROUGHOUT THEIR SEVEN-FOLD BIRTHS THE LOVE OF THOSE HAVE WIPED AWAY THEIR AFFLICTION.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-108
'Tis never good to let the thought of good things done thee pass away;
Of things not good, 'tis good to rid thy memory that very day.
IT IS NOT GOOD TO FORGET A BENEFIT; IT IS GOOD TO FORGET AN INJURY EVEN IN THE VERY MOMENT (IN WHICH IT IS INFLICTED).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-109
Effaced straightway is deadliest injury,
By thought of one kind act in days gone by.
THOUGH ONE INFLICT AN INJURY GREAT AS MURDER, IT WILL PERISH BEFORE THE THOUGHT OF ONE BENEFIT (WHICH WAS FORMERLY CONFERRED).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Kural-110
Who every good have killed, may yet destruction flee;
Who 'benefit' has killed, that man shall ne'er 'scape free!
HE WHO HAS KILLED EVERY VIRTUE MAY YET ESCAPE; THERE IS NO ESCAPE FOR HIM WHO HAS KILLED A BENEFIT.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-56657592763362825532013-08-15T20:43:00.002-07:002013-08-15T20:43:29.838-07:00What caste after love marriage?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
A friend has drawn my attention to the following question posted on a chat site and asked for my answer.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is the question:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My girlfriend and I are from different castes. My girlfriend would like to continue in her own caste, and I don't have any objection to that. Is it possible for her to continue in her own caste after marriage? And, if we have children, is it possible for them to remain in the mother's caste?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here's my answer:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In our country, there is a huge difference between what is said and what is done, what the law says and what happens in reality (to a certain extent, this is the case everywhere but, generally, Protestant countris have the least gap between these, while "non-Protestant Christian" countries have a larger gap (and non-Christian societies have the biggest gap). That is not to say that, in the modern world, Christians as individuals are better than others - they may be or they may not be. My point is about the societies and nations that have been created by the different religious philosophies or ideologies).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So the facts in relation to your question are the following:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. There is no legal reason in modern India why a wife cannot retain her maiden name.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. There is also no legal reason why the children cannot take the mother's family or caste name.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. If the motivation for the move on your girlfriend's part is to retain the favour of her community, that is a very good motivation but, in order for it to work as intended, she needs to talk to her parents and her community leaders to see if this would be an acceptable compromise. If they agree, then there is no reason to avoid proceeding with this arrangement.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
4. However, if the motivation is to avoid caste slurs from members of your wife's caste on your children, this may or may not work. That is because, in our society, inter-caste marriages are always "out-caste" from both castes, as are the children. Generally, if any society does not follow the rule of casting out mixed-caste marriages, the caste that does the accepting is the lower caste. However, you need to be aware that since India's independence, caste is becoming less and less strong. However, if BJP comes to power in the next elections, it is not clear whether casteist forces will regain official momentum, as they have been regaining some momentum in some parts of the country since the last spell of NDA rule from 1998 to 2004 Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-26752484254977831712013-06-13T23:40:00.001-07:002013-06-13T23:40:46.700-07:00Astronomy and the dating of the Mahabharata and the Ramayana<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Following some discussion on a thread re Valmiki and the Dating of the Ramayana, my view was asked for, following this contribution:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
“Sometime ago I read a book "80 Questions to Understand India" by Murad Ali Baig - something I picked up for airplane reading while browsing at a bookstore in India. Now Murad is not an historian - just that he studied history at St. Stephens college. A lot of what he has written seems implausible but it does give a fresh perspective on a lot of things that we read in our history books. Here is some of stuff that he wrote (and this is from my recollection of things I read a few months ago):
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
" 'The Ramayana was set in present Kryghistan/Uzbekistan around 1400BC. The Mahabharata happened near and around the time of Troy. These epics which were passed on through the oral tradition and may have traveled to India with the Vedic spread eastwards and got "localized" over time. Hinduism which is touted as one of the oldest religions of the world may actually be less than a 1000 years old. It may have started around 300 AD and got established over the next 3 or 400 hundred years mostly by the destruction of Buddhist shrines and their replacement with Hindu temples and the forced conversion of Buddhists to Hinduism by Brahmins who were trying to establish their control (as advisers to various rulers). Hinduism as we know it today may have been established by Shankaracharya around 8th centurey AD and defined in its present form by Raja Ramohan Roy in the early 19th century. Of course if you include the Buddhist and Vedic parts then it is over 5000 years old.”
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
My response:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
“I am honoured to be asked to comment:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
“Scholars must always keep an open mind for their current views to be modified or even falsified, so I always try to look at all new evidence possible, in order to see what is really before me as evidence, and not be prejudiced by my own thoughts or theories…
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
“I have not read Murad Ali Baig’s "80 Questions to Understand India" – would you recommend that I read it?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
“As for the theories that you cite from that book:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
1. There is no consensus among scholars about the location of the Mahabharata War (archeological evidence shows that a war certainly took place in the Kurukshetra region, but then wars took place in many regions – the archeological evidence at Kurukshetra does not indicate a war on anything like the scale that the Mahabharata describes; this is not to say that no such great war as described in the Mahabharata took place in India - it may well have taken place, but at present we have no incontrovertible evidence of it).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
2. Nor is there any consensus about the date of the Mahabharata. Estimates vary from roughly five thousand BC to the 9th century BC
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
3. Calculations based on the astronomical references in the Mahabharata itself, range from roughly 5,500 BC (P N Oak & P V Vartak, who differ slightly on the exact date), to 3143 BC (P V Holey), to 3067 BC (B N Achar) to 2559 BC (S. Balakrishna) to 1478 BC (R. N. Iyengar). My conclusion: the astronomical references are clearly too vague, if they allow such scholars to arrive at dates 4000 years apart.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
4. As for Murad’s view that the War took place in Kryghistan/Uzbekistan, it is possible, given that so much of the Vedas originate somewhere in Central Asia (please note: I am *not* saying that our Mahabharata was written there, only that much Vedic material, in its oral form, came from somewhere in Central Asia, and that might have included tales of a great war there, which may then have become conflated with a local war in India some millennia or at least centuries later)
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
5. Baig’s view of the start of “Hinduism” in AD300 or so, probably comes from the fact that that is when murti-puja started in our country, as a result of Greek influence (Alexander the Great and all that) – almost certainly, we had no murtis before that. Most of the gods we worship today start after that date, and are then “read back” into the Vedas; a huge number of gods who are prayed to in the Vedas have disappeared in our consciousness, thought and practice so that no one worships them now - this is not as astonishing as first appears to people unacquainted with India – we have had massive transitions in our religious thought and practice just in our own lifetime – consider Ganga-Puja in Varanasi!!! Ganga Mata was never earlier worshipped at Varanasi, only at Haridwar (and possibly at Gangotri – though I have not been able to establish that); or consider the changes in Durga Puja even in Bengal – but Sandip is able to tell us much more about that than I can…
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
6. Shankaracharyaji’s impact was huge, and he certainly put in place many of things that we now associate with mainstream Hindu thought and practices.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
7. It is too much to say that Raja Ram Mohan Roy “defined Hinduism in its present form”; what is true is that Roy *and* the Bengal Renaissance as a whole formed what are the different streams of Hindu thought and practice today. For example, the idea that all religions are “the same” or “lead to the same end” does not exist in India before Sri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa came up with this idea in the late 19th century. The Brahmo Samaj, the Arya Samaj, the Prarthana Samaj, the Ramakrishna Mission were, each of them, like so many others (and the number has only multiplied with time, down to the Brahma Kumaris and ISKCON and Osho and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and all our new gurus) are all reform movements, new movements – movements to *change* the traditions that were established up to the end of the 19th century. In that sense, it is correct to say that “Hinduism”, as we see it today, only goes back a century or so. However, as we all know, there is no such thing as “HinduISM”, there are many Hinduisms; and that gives us the liberty to say that Hindu thought and practice goes back 5000 years (or 7000 years or whatever).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
8. Buddhism is a different matter. Buddhism and Jainism were anti-Vedic. The anti-Buddhist (and, by the way, anti-Jain) movement culminated in Shankaracharyaji’s inclusion of Buddhist and Jain ideas into Hindu thought and practice. For example, vegetarianism and reincarnation are not Vedic ideas (the Vedas relish meat-eating! I should say that I am a vegetarian...). Vegetarianism and reincarnation are originally Jain ideas (Buddhism does have a version of reincarnation, but we did not accept the Buddhist version, we accepted the Jain version); Buddhism was originally NON-vegetarian – the Buddha himself ate meat – which, by the way, is the reason that Tibetan Buddhists, Thai Buddhists, and so many other Buddhists (including IN India) are non-vegetarian, whereas you are far less likely to find a Jain who is non-vegetarian, even today…
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
9. Buddhism and Jainism date from around the 6th century BC, though Jainism claims antecedents going back to Rishabha (claimed to be, by various people, as long back as perhaps the 8th millennium BC).
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Warm regards
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Prabhu
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9010116423893922613.post-45368559505084697082013-06-09T23:21:00.000-07:002013-06-09T23:45:11.010-07:00The Nazis created the myth of the Aryan super race of the past, and sold that fiction to the naive German populace...a similar thing is happening in India (of course like in Germany of the past, there are still many Hindus that question this nonsense)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
The title (above) is from the latest message sent by a correspondent of mine, who is interacting with me on the subject of whether India was leagues ahead of other countries in technology before "the British destroyed our civilisation".
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Here is an excerpt from my last mail to him:
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
It is difficult enough to understand how a rich and highly populated land like India could have come to be ruled by foreigners, even assuming parity in technology.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
If one asserts that Indian technology was actually that many leagues better, then the difficulty becomes insuperable – or rather the moral turpitude of our ancestors becomes even more incredible, as the only reason we would have lost would have been betrayal by insiders.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
In that case, we may have been technologically superior, but we were all the more morally inferior – and our own history should be a standing illustration of the fact that all the technological superiority in the world is of no use when there is lack of honesty, morality and loyalty.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
So the preeminent factor in civilizational longevity or success is not technology but morality.
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
And if our culture BEFORE the foreigners came was not able to build a sufficient morality or ethics, then what is the use of trying to revive that culture?
<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br /></div>
Does our ancient culture not need to be supplemented by ethical and moral values from a different source?
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06355114808619181084noreply@blogger.com0